How to Leverage the Real Potential of Psychological Safety Climate: The Hidden Ecosystem Driving Performance, Retention, and Innovation

Explore how Psychological Safety Climate shapes everything from employee well-being and adaptability to resilience and high performance. This article offers actionable guidance for building a culture where people feel safe to speak up, take smart risks, and contribute at their full capacity—equipping leaders to cultivate the conditions where health, wellness, and performance initiatives can truly take root and deliver.

Abstract

Organizations are under increasing pressure to improve well-being, engagement, and retention—but many struggle to achieve lasting results. What’s missing isn’t more initiatives; it’s the climate that allows them to work. Drawing on global research patterns and emerging trends, this article unpacks how Psychological Safety Climate operates across individuals, teams, and organizations—shaping everything from how initiatives actually land to employees’ willingness to ask for support or offer input. This article also introduces a working theory from Work Wellness Boutique: that PSC may be key to encouraging executive brain function, enabling the kind of adaptive, high-level thinking that today’s complex environments demand. For leaders ready to move beyond surface fixes, this is an invitation to rethink what kind of climate truly drives sustainable success.

Set Yourself Up for Deeper Insights and Smarter Moves.

Start with your Real Cost Radar—your complimentary diagnostic that gives you a snapshot of what’s working (and what’s not) in under 10 minutes. So you can dive into the right strategies with clarity.

Introduction

Across industries, leaders are facing a quiet but costly reality: despite record investments in wellness programs and culture initiatives, many still find themselves facing persistent challenges—turnover, burnout, disengagement—that resist familiar solutions.

If you’ve found yourself wondering why desired outcomes aren’t following your initiatives, you’re not alone—and you’re not wrong to suspect the issue runs deeper.

At the heart of this disconnect is Psychological Safety Climate (PSC): the often-overlooked ecosystem that shapes how employees experience risk, trust, and care at work. Unlike individual-level interventions, PSC isn’t a program or benefit—it’s the underlying climate that determines whether every other investment you make in your people can take root and deliver.

Here’s what makes PSC so powerful: it’s always present. Whether intentionally shaped or left on autopilot, PSC is the background condition that amplifies—or undermines—performance, well-being, innovation, and retention. While PSC has gained increasing attention in recent years, its deeper role—as the climate that shapes the success or failure of every people-focused strategy—remains undervalued.

In this article, we’ll break down what PSC is, why it matters, and how it delivers outcomes that individual strategies can’t achieve alone. We’ll also introduce a developing lens worth watching: the theory that PSC doesn’t just protect against harm—it may actually enable the kind of executive brain function that makes higher-order collaboration and adaptive performance possible.

If you’re here, you’re already ahead of the curve. This is your opportunity to understand the climate that shapes every other move your organization makes—and to start seeing wellness not as a standalone initiative, but as part of an integrated system that determines whether people, and performance, can truly thrive.

What Is Psychological Safety Climate—and Why Does It Matter?

Psychological Safety Climate (PSC) operates as a foundational ecosystem within organizations—shaping how employees navigate risk, trust, and care in their daily work. While many workplace initiatives target individual well-being, PSC addresses the broader organizational conditions that influence whether people can engage, perform, and thrive (Amoadu et al., 2024).

PSC refers to the shared perceptions employees hold about their organization’s policies, practices, and procedures designed to protect psychological health and safety (Amoadu et al., 2024). It includes factors such as leadership’s commitment to mental health, how openly safety concerns are communicated, and the extent to which employees are invited to participate in shaping solutions.

Research across industries consistently reinforces PSC’s impact. For example, studies on Libyan construction sites found that higher levels of PSC predicted better safety compliance and engagement (Dera et al., 2025). In Italian hospitals, a study of 196 nurses showed that positive PSC buffered against relational stressors and emotional exhaustion—an especially critical finding in high-pressure healthcare environments (Galanti et al., 2024).

How Does Psychological Safety Shape the Whole System?

PSC operates at multiple levels, influencing not just individuals, but teams and entire organizations:

• Individual Level:
  A large-scale study of 604 Dutch medical doctors showed that those working in high-PSC environments reported lower burnout and higher job satisfaction (van Duijnhoven et al., 2025). Importantly, PSC reduced social harassment and strengthened job resources, illustrating how organizational climate directly shapes individual experience (van Duijnhoven et al., 2025)./

• Team Level:
  In a four-year study of 769 staff across 20 rural K–12 schools in the U.S., PSC remained remarkably stable even during the COVID-19 pandemic (Fleming et al., 2024). Teams with consistently high PSC reported less burnout, stronger self-efficacy, and more positive perceptions of their work environment compared to those with lower PSC (Fleming et al., 2024).
  

• Organizational Level:
  A comprehensive review of 38 studies across diverse sectors found that strong PSC was linked to lower rates of mistreatment—such as bullying and harassment—and higher levels of well-being, resilience, and hope, across industries and national contexts (Amoadu et al., 2024).

Why Does Context Matter for Psychological Safety Climate?

What separates genuine Psychological Safety Climate (PSC) from surface-level wellness efforts is its deep integration into the organizational ecosystem. PSC is not a plug-in solution—it’s a set of conditions that must be calibrated to the unique demands, roles, and environments of each workplace (Hallam et al., 2023; Amoadu et al., 2024; Galanti et al., 2024; van Duijnhoven et al., 2025).

In healthcare, a qualitative study identified eight key elements shaping psychologically safe workplaces: effective communication, leadership practices, organizational culture, performance feedback, respect, staff development, teamwork, and trust (Hallam et al., 2023). These factors interact differently depending on context, showing that meaningful PSC requires a multidimensional approach—not isolated interventions.

This becomes especially clear when examining emergency medical services (EMS), where employees are at elevated risk of suicide. A systematic review found that many EMS workers perceived mental health support as offered out of obligation rather than genuine care—creating a significant barrier to use (Johnston et al., 2025). The study highlighted key enablers, including a culture of self-care, alignment with organizational values, and strong leadership commitment, reinforcing that the quality of PSC shapes whether resources are trusted and used (Johnston et al., 2025).

In construction, a review of mental health drivers identified 43 factors impacting PSC, with high job demands, interpersonal relationships, and low job control as key contributors. While organizational participation factors received the most research attention, management commitment remained underexplored—pointing to a critical need for leadership engagement across all dimensions of PSC (Golzad et al., 2023).

How Do Choice and Authenticity Shape Psychological Safety Climate?

A study on hybrid workplaces adds another layer of nuance. Researchers found that forced “fun” activities designed to boost morale often backfired, undermining psychological safety when employees felt pressured to participate (Plester & Lloyd, 2023). In contrast, environments that allowed individuals to “be themselves”—including the choice to opt out of social activities—fostered genuine psychological safety. Key themes identified included risk during transitions, unsafe fun, safety to be oneself, and leadership influences (Plester & Lloyd, 2023).

Taken together, the research underscores that PSC is not a one-size-fits-all initiative. It’s a context-sensitive climate shaped by how organizational systems, leadership behaviors, and cultural practices align to meet the real needs of employees.

The Business Case: Why Should Organizations Invest in Psychological Safety Climate?

In today’s workforce, where rising people costs and shifting expectations challenge organizational performance, the business case for Psychological Safety Climate (PSC) is increasingly supported by evidence. In healthcare settings, high-PSC environments are linked to reduced emotional exhaustion, psychological distress, and workplace injuries—outcomes with clear financial implications related to lost time, claims, and recruitment costs (Amoadu et al., 2025; Zadow et al., 2017). Conversely, low-PSC environments are associated with higher compensation claims, presenteeism, and turnover intentions (Amoadu et al., 2025).

Across sectors, PSC also acts as a buffer against the negative effects of high job demands, enabling employees to access job resources and social support (Amoadu et al., 2025; Yulita et al., 2022). In this way, PSC functions as a proactive risk management strategy—addressing mental health-related costs before they escalate.

How Does Psychological Safety Climate Boost Engagement, Innovation, and Adaptability?

Beyond mitigating risk, PSC creates the conditions for higher performance. High-PSC environments support job resources such as autonomy, supervisory support, and psychological capital, all of which are linked to engagement and innovation (Amoadu et al., 2025; Madrid et al., 2024). In healthcare, PSC has been associated with improved workarounds, peer support, and leadership—factors critical to agile, high-performing teams (Amoadu et al., 2025).

Team-level research shows that when leaders foster positive emotional climates, they support proactive problem prevention and innovation—capabilities that are particularly vital in industries undergoing rapid change (Madrid et al., 2024).

How Does Psychological Safety Climate Strengthen Competitive Advantage?

In a talent-driven economy, PSC is increasingly a differentiator. Organizations with strong PSC not only retain top talent but also benefit from reputational advantages tied to service reliability, quality, and trust (Amoadu et al., 2025). In healthcare and other mission-critical sectors, PSC has been linked to outcomes such as patient safety and accreditation performance (Amoadu et al., 2025).

Moreover, PSC promotes organizational citizenship behaviors and cultures of reciprocity—qualities that build long-term resilience and brand value (Amoadu et al., 2025). For organizations seeking to sustain competitive advantage, investing in PSC is not just beneficial; it’s strategic.

What Does Global Research Tell Us About Psychological Safety Climate?

Psychological Safety Climate (PSC) has been studied across industries and geographies, consistently emerging as a predictor of critical outcomes—including lower burnout, improved safety behaviors, stronger job performance, and enhanced innovation (Bano et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2024; Fleming et al., 2024). While its expression varies by context, research shows that a strong PSC creates the enabling conditions for individuals and teams to thrive—particularly in high-pressure environments where psychological resources are essential (Dai et al., 2025).

How Does Psychological Safety Climate Shape Results Across Sectors?

In education, a longitudinal study of 769 staff across 20 rural U.S. schools found that educators with consistently high PSC reported significantly lower burnout and higher self-efficacy—even during the disruptive COVID-19 period (Fleming et al., 2024). By contrast, educators in low-PSC environments experienced declining connectedness and rising emotional exhaustion (Fleming et al., 2024).

In the construction sector, where psychological safety is often overshadowed by physical risk controls, PSC emerged as a critical performance factor (Chen et al., 2024). A two-nation study of construction workers in Canada and the U.S. showed that interpersonal conflict and lack of supervisory support predicted higher rates of unsafe events (Chen et al., 2024).  Notably, individual resilience helped mitigate these risks—but only when supported by a positive PSC (Chen et al., 2024). Workers in high-PSC environments were significantly less likely to engage in risky behavior, even under stress (Chen et al., 2024).

In nonprofit organizations working under extreme environmental and political conditions, PSC played a similarly vital role. A study of 170 NGO workers in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan, found that ethical leadership was only effective when paired with PSC (Bano et al., 2024). Employees in high-PSC environments were more willing to disclose challenges, request support, acknowledge limits, and ultimately demonstrated stronger job performance under volatile conditions (Bano et al., 2024). Here, PSC functioned as both a buffer against burnout and a catalyst for mission-aligned action.

Why Does Psychological Safety Climate Hold Up Across Cultures?

Importantly, PSC’s relevance holds across national and cultural contexts. The construction study demonstrated measurement invariance between Canadian and American workers, while a study of 440 young employees in high-tech Chinese firms found that inclusive human resource practices increased perceptions of psychological safety and, in turn, proactive socialization behaviors (Chen et al., 2024; Dai et al., 2025). These effects were even stronger among employees with high protean career orientations—indicating that PSC enables both day-to-day functioning and long-term organizational integration (Dai et al., 2025).

How Does Psychological Safety Climate Actually Work in Organizations?

PSC delivers outcomes not only by reducing harm, but by activating key psychological and social mechanisms. In the education sector, PSC buffered the effects of pandemic-related stress by increasing access to leadership support and peer collaboration (Fleming et al., 2024). In construction, PSC strengthened worker resilience, directly reducing unsafe behaviors (Chen et al., 2024). In NGOs, PSC amplified the impact of ethical leadership by creating an environment where staff could voice concerns, take interpersonal risks, and contribute authentically (Bano et al., 2024). 

These findings align with the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) model, where PSC functions as an environmental resource that buffers strain while amplifying motivation, resilience, and role clarity (Dai et al., 2025; Fleming et al., 2024). Across settings, PSC creates the psychological bandwidth required for employees to engage, adapt, and lead.

What Is the Brain Science Behind Psychological Safety Climate’s Power?

Although the positive outcomes of Psychological Safety Climate (PSC) are well documented—reduced burnout, improved collaboration, and greater adaptability—the question of why PSC is so powerful remains underexplored. Drawing from developmental psychology and recovery science, Work Wellness Boutique proposes a working theory: that PSC is so effective because it enables individuals to operate in an executive brain state.

Executive function (EF) refers to cognitive capacities such as working memory, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility—skills that underpin innovation, self-regulation, and complex problem-solving (Hu et al., 2024; Wang & Li, 2025). Critically, EF is context-sensitive: it depends on cues of safety and connection in the surrounding environment.

How Might Psychological Safety Climate Enable Executive Function?

In developmental research, a longitudinal study of 873 preschool children found that improvements in EF were closely tied to environmental factors like consistency, predictability, trust, and emotional safety (Anderson et al., 2022). Children in classrooms emphasizing relational safety, problem-solving support, and clear boundaries demonstrated gains in executive function, which in turn predicted improved readiness across cognitive and social-emotional domains (Anderson et al., 2022).  This suggests that safety doesn’t just regulate emotions—it unlocks higher-order brain function essential for learning and adaptive behavior.

What Does Research Reveal About Stress and Executive Function?

Among adolescents, executive function has been shown to act as a buffer between high-pressure situations and poor social outcomes. A large study of over 1,400 students found that EF capacities—such as inhibition, working memory, and cognitive flexibility—reduced both proactive and reactive aggression, helping adolescents manage impulsivity and navigate challenging social environments more constructively (Hu et al., 2024).

While this might seem distant from workplace dynamics, the underlying mechanism is strikingly relevant. Adults under sustained job pressure are not so different from adolescents navigating social stressors: both groups rely on executive function as a buffer between environmental demands and reactive behavior. In the workplace, this buffering effect can shape how employees respond to conflict, challenge, and role-related stress—making PSC’s role in supporting EF highly consequential.

In adults, emerging evidence points to similar dynamics. A 2025 study involving adults practicing traditional Chinese movement-based exercises like Tai Chi found improvements in EF and increased connectivity between brain regions associated with attention, inhibition, and cognitive control (Wang & Li, 2025). While not a workplace study, it offers a concrete example of how interventions promoting internal regulation can strengthen cognitive capacities essential to complex roles.

What Does Adult Evidence Reveal About Psychological Safety in High-Stakes Circumstances?

While much of the research on Psychological Safety Climate (PSC) focuses on workplace performance, related studies in recovery and regulated practice environments offer useful insights into how safety supports individuals under ongoing stress.

A 2025 study of The Phoenix—a sober-active community for individuals recovering from substance use—found that psychological safety fully mediated the relationship between program participation and outcomes like empowerment, hope, improved mental and physical health, and sustained motivation to stay sober (Heinrich et al., 2025). While this is a recovery setting, the underlying pattern is highly relevant to the workplace. Many employees are quietly managing chronic stress, health challenges, or the risk of burnout and mental health leave. For these employees, PSC can be the difference between staying engaged with adequate support, cycling through repeated short-term absences, or ultimately disengaging entirely. Psychological safety doesn’t just protect performance—it can stabilize it in populations that are often overlooked or underserved by conventional well-being strategies.

Are There Simple Ways to Improve Psychological Safety Climate?

A 2025 study with children experiencing learning difficulties found that practicing traditional Chinese movement-based exercises such as Tai Chi significantly improved executive functioning and increased connectivity between brain regions tied to attention, inhibition, and cognitive control (Wang & Li, 2025). While this research focuses on children, it offers a compelling example: simple, well-designed interventions that enhance safety and connection in the moment can have meaningful impacts on cognitive performance—even in populations facing regulatory or learning challenges.

Research suggests that these mindfulness based collective practices may enhance PSC in addition to EF. A qualitative study in four Danish companies found that a workplace-adapted Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program improved psychological safety and social capital (Bonde et al., 2023). Employees reported greater openness, empathy, and willingness to engage in difficult conversations—shifts tied to a more reflective, less reactive mindset (Bonde et al., 2023). Importantly, the intervention focused on organizational norms and relationships, not just individual coping—highlighting how small, shared practices can shape the broader climate (Bonde et al., 2023).

How Could Psychological Safety Climate Support Executive Function at Work?

Taken together, these studies suggest a promising new lens for organizations to consider: Psychological Safety Climate may do more than reduce harm—it may create the conditions for individuals and teams to access their full cognitive and relational capacity. By supporting a shift into an executive brain state, PSC could enable the kind of reflective, adaptive, and collaborative behaviors that drive high performance.

While more empirical research is needed to directly test this mechanism in adult workplaces, the parallels across disciplines point toward a meaningful and underexplored connection. Just as children cannot learn when operating in survival or emotional brain states, adults cannot innovate, problem-solve, or lead effectively when navigating environments of chronic interpersonal risk. For organizations, this invites a new kind of leadership reflection: not just how to protect people from harm, but how to intentionally cultivate the climate that encourages their best thinking and contribution.

What Role Do Leaders Play in Building Psychological Safety Climate?

Psychological Safety Climate (PSC) is often described as an organizational or cultural factor—but in practice, its strongest signals are interpersonal. Leaders play a pivotal role in shaping PSC, not just through policies or values statements, but through their daily behaviors, structural choices, and responses under pressure.

Employees don’t evaluate PSC based on what leaders say about wellness or support—they judge it based on what leaders do, especially in moments of tension, dissent, or vulnerability. Research consistently shows that psychological safety is an interpersonal risk calculation: employees ask themselves, What is the cost of speaking up, asking for help, or disclosing a mistake here?—and it’s leaders who set the tone for how costly—or safe—those behaviors feel (Madrid et al., 2024; Edmondson, 1999).

How Do Leadership Behaviors Influence Psychological Safety Climate?

A longitudinal study of 504 professionals across 134 teams found that leaders who consistently evoked positive emotional states—like enthusiasm, optimism, or calm—were more likely to create teams with high psychological safety, which in turn predicted proactive problem-solving (Madrid et al., 2024). In contrast, leaders who generated tension, worry, or defensiveness undermined psychological safety, even if their approach sometimes drove short-term action (Madrid et al., 2024).

Importantly, PSC is shaped in small, repeated moments—not by slogans or one-time gestures. Research in healthcare found that departments where leaders explicitly named psychological safety as a goal, reinforced it in meetings, and modeled reflective practice showed measurable improvements in team culture (Zlabinger et al., 2024). Where psychological safety was treated as a compliance exercise, little change occurred; authentic, visible leadership mattered (Zlabinger et al., 2024).

Why Does Modeling Vulnerability Matter for Leaders?

One of the most powerful ways leaders can build PSC is by making interpersonal risk feel normal and permissible—this includes visibly setting boundaries, acknowledging uncertainty, and modeling self-care. When leaders admit they don’t have all the answers or share their own experiences with workload or limits, they send a critical signal: fallibility is not a threat to belonging or competence (Amoadu et al., 2024; Madrid et al., 2024). These micro-moments shape whether employees feel safe to raise concerns, suggest new ideas, or acknowledge early signs of struggle—actions that can prevent crises, foster innovation, and strengthen team cohesion (Zlabinger et al., 2024; Edmondson, 1999).

What Can Leaders Learn from High-Pressure Settings Like Sports?

The costs of disclosure under pressure are particularly vivid in elite sports. A study of 233 team-sport athletes found that players were more likely to report concussion symptoms when their coaches demonstrated transformational leadership and fostered a strong PSC (Shuman et al., 2025). Reporting a concussion can carry steep costs—lost playing time, reputation, or opportunity. Yet in environments with high PSC, athletes felt safer disclosing without fear of judgment or penalty (Shuman et al., 2025).  This dynamic mirrors what many professionals experience at work, where using support systems or acknowledging limits or reaching out for support can feel risky without the right climate.

What Kind of Tools Can Support Leaders in Psychological Safety Climate Efforts?

Recent research highlights practical tools that help leaders translate PSC from concept to action. The WellNext Scan, developed to assess physician well-being, integrates measures of psychological safety, team cohesion, and support for self-care (Abedali et al., 2025). Importantly, the tool was not just diagnostic—it catalyzed team-level conversations about stress, work design, and values. Leaders who used the results to open meaningful dialogue helped embed PSC into everyday functioning, rather than treating it as a stand-alone initiative (Abedali et al., 2025).

What Happens When Organizations Invest in Psychological Safety Climate?

Psychological Safety Climate isn’t a buzzword or an optional add-on—it’s the ecosystem that determines whether every investment in people, culture, and performance can take root and deliver. Across industries and contexts, research shows that when PSC is present, organizations see lower burnout, stronger retention, better innovation, and higher resilience. But these outcomes don’t happen by accident—they emerge when leaders intentionally cultivate a climate where trust, respect, and care are consistently signaled.

As this article has explored, PSC operates at every level: it shapes individual well-being, team dynamics, and organizational outcomes. It helps determine whether employees feel safe enough to speak up, access support, and take the interpersonal risks that drive adaptive performance. And while wellness programs and individual supports matter, their success depends on the broader climate they are embedded within.

For leaders, this invites a shift in mindset: from asking what programs to offer, to asking what conditions will allow people and performance to thrive. The evidence suggests that investing in PSC is not just about reducing harm—it’s about unlocking the full potential of the individuals and teams you’ve already invested in.

If you’ve made it this far, you’re already ahead of the curve. This is your opportunity to reframe wellness, leadership, and innovation as an integrated system—one where climate is not background noise, but a strategic lever for lasting impact.

Not Sure What’s Next? You Don’t Have to Figure It Out Alone

I’ll walk you through your options for real-time support, complimentary resources, and strategic guidance—just head to the homepage when you’re ready to start exploring next steps.

References

Abedali, S., van den Berg, J., Smirnova, A., Debets, M., Bogerd, R., & Lombarts, K. (2025). The WellNext Scan: Validity evidence of a new team-based tool to map and support physicians’ well-being in the clinical working context. PLOS ONE, 20(2), e0319038. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319038

Amoadu, M., Agyare, D. F., Doe, P. F., & Abraham, S. A. (2025). Examining the impact of psychosocial safety climate on working conditions, well-being and safety of healthcare providers: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 25(90). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12254-2

Amoadu, M., Ansah, E. W., & Sarfo, J. O. (2024). Preventing workplace mistreatment and improving workers’ mental health: A scoping review of the impact of psychosocial safety climate. BMC Psychology, 12(195). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01675-z

Anderson, K. L., Nesbitt, K. T., Sheeks, N. A., Vrabec, A., Boris, K., & Fuhs, M. W. (2022). Executive function mediates the relationship between Conscious Discipline fidelity and kindergarten readiness. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 79, 101393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101393

Bano, S., Zu, L. J., & Imran, M. (2024). Relationship between ethical leadership and job performance in non-profit organizations of Pakistan: Mediating role of psychological safety. Public Integrity. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2024.2391129

Batten, J., Smith, M. J., Young, J., Braim, A., Jull, R., Samuels, C., Pearce, A. J., & White, A. J. (2025). Transformational leadership, psychological safety, and concussion reporting intentions in team-sport athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(3), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22030393

Bonde, E. H., Mikkelsen, E. G., Fjorback, L. O., & Juul, L. (2023). The impact of an organizational-level mindfulness-based intervention on workplace social capital and psychological safety: A qualitative content analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1112907. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112907

Chen, Y., Hyatt, D., Shahi, A., Hanna, A., & Safa, M. (2024). How can conflicts with supervisors or coworkers affect construction workers’ safety performance on site? Two cross-sectional studies in North America. Buildings, 14(5), 1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051245

Dai, X., Fang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025). Inclusive human resource management practices influence young new employees’ proactive organizational socialization. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 53(3), e13804. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.13804

Fleming, C. M., Calvert, H. G., & Turner, L. (2024). Psychological safety among K–12 educators: Patterns over time, and associations with staff well-being and organizational context. Psychology in the Schools, 61(11), 2315–2337. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23165

Heinrich, K. M., Wyker, B., Collinson, B., Eddie, D., Best, D., & Hillios, J. (2025). Psychological safety mediates attendance and recovery-related outcomes within the Phoenix: A sober-active community. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1458026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1458026

Hu, C. S., Wang, Y., Sun, Y., Gong, G., & Bao, L. (2024). Executive function mediates the relationship between impulsivity and aggressive behavior in adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 52(4), e12908. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.13804

Madrid, H. P., Vasquez, C. A., & Escaffi-Schwarz, M. (2024). Leader affective presence, psychological safety and team proactive problem prevention. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 97(516–535). https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12480

Porter-Stransky, K. A., Horneffer-Ginter, K. J., Bauler, L. D., Gibson, K. M., Haymaker, C. M., & Rothney, M. (2024). Improving departmental psychological safety through a medical school–wide initiative. BMC Medical Education, 24, 800. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05794-4

Wang, X., & Li, H. (2025). Effects of different traditional Chinese mind–body exercises on learning abilities, executive functions, and brain connectivity in children with learning difficulties. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030303

Yulita, Y., Idris, M. A., & Dollard, M. F. (2022). Effect of psychosocial safety climate on psychological distress via job resources, work engagement and workaholism: A multilevel longitudinal study. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28(3), 691–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2020.1822054

Zadow, A. J., Dollard, M. F., McLinton, S. S., Lawrence, P., & Tuckey, M. R. (2017). Psychosocial safety climate, emotional exhaustion, and work injuries in healthcare workplaces. Stress & Health, 33(6), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2740